Past and Present Politics and Development Research Paper

Past and Present governing and Development - Research Paper ExampleIn his tour, he learnt that the natives were always hostile to the unseasoned quite a little who purportedly brought in new blood into the policy-making organization and development practices of the natives. In the early years, missionaries play a predominant role in changing the political and organizational scenario of the places where they went. The traveling of missionaries to places that had not genuine economically marked the beginning of civilization and modernization in most rudimentary or underdevelop societies. It was only after the insurgence of missionaries that native undeveloped societies began to embrace peace, governance, professionalism such as teaching, soldiers, doctors and bureaucrats all of whom contributed to the roughhewn good of the societies. Diamond (1999) believed that the first step to the true development of the society was through the practice of kitchen-gardening on commercializ ed basis. Given that the ancient people and not so long ago the undeveloped states had no regular economic specialization and land was subdivided among group members and subgroups, the political organization was considered egalitarian. ... d since Eurasia which was goddamned with local/indigenous domestic able grain cereals and animals that facilitated traction animals like the donkeys and bulls. This encouraged the development of commercial large scale agriculture which enabled economic growth and also stratified societies such that there emerged affectionate classes. Reasons for Lack of Single or Complex political Organizations Although Diamond argued that states expand and develop based on their level of agricultural practice and that this happens in a virtuous circle (1999, p. 266), there have been occurrences that retort his argument which in Diamonds view was assumed and therefore needs to be added to the hypothesis of why states develop and expand. Therefore, it implies th at, instead of states ultimately growing to large and more complex organizations, there is both unequal growth of societies into becoming on single large complex organization or eventual stagnation of states. This lack of large and more complex organizations be attributed to internal incidentors within the States themselves a fact Diamond does not incorporate in his theory. The first reason is based on the fact that political organizations are slowly, but steadily emerging that is not necessarily egalitarian in nature. In some other words the states themselves are greedy and are often unwilling to distribute public funds that are supposed to facilitate growth of complex organizations. Secondly, given the divergent states interests, it is hard or perhaps out of the question for the world to attain a single world or complex organization that Diamond proposes (Diamond 1999, p. 290). In the face of democracy and human rights, political organizations and by far autonomy is slowly r evolving into a new era of leadership and political authority. In the